A- de 2017
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Cesar Antonio Villamizar Nuñez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Negar por cuanto ninguna de las expresiones contenidas en su parte resolutiva o motiva genera duda o perplejidad para su cumplimiento
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-305/17.
La petición fue elevada por dos magistrados de la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Cúcuta.
Por considerar que no existe en la providencia de la referencia frases o conceptos que sugieran duda, ambigüedad o confusión en su interpretación, la Corte decide NEGAR la aclaración pedida. .
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-035 de 2017.
- SEGUNDO. INFORMAR a los interesados que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
- TERCERO. Por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, COMUNICAR la presente providencia a las partes.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.